PHED 400: Case Study

Practicum: Create a case study related to the partner student as a result of the field experience.

Student Name: ______________

	Target (5)	Acceptable (3)	Unacceptable (<3)
Content Clarity	( ) Consists of well-defined and clearly developed paragraphs that are consistent and logically connected to each other maintaining the flow.	( ) Statements are generally clear. The case study consists of clearly developed paragraphs that are logically connected to each other maintaining the flow of the paper.	( ) The statements are unclear/ ambiguous. The case study does not consist of well-defined and clearly developed paragraphs. It fails to maintain a flow to the paper.
Components	( ) Required components are thoroughly reported and indicate in-depth knowledge of the case.	( ) Required components are reported in the case study demonstrating an understanding of the case.	( ) Required components are missing from the case study, are not stated clearly or misrepresent the case.
Supporting Details	( ) The case study is supported by critical reflection of the experience and additional readings/resources.	( ) The case study is supported with resources and mention of experiences.	( ) The case study is not supported with any course readings, additional resources nor is there any mention of experiences.
Lab Activity	( ) The case study includes multiple examples of activities and helpful teaching strategies that enhanced the child’s learning experience.	( ) The case study includes mention of lab activities and helpful teaching strategies.	( ) The case study fails to mention lab activities and helpful teaching strategies.
Resources	( ) Two or more resources are cited in the proper APA format at the conclusion of the case study. Student collaboration with community resources is noted.	( ) One resource is cited in APA format at the conclusion of the case with only a minor citation error.	( ) No resources are cited at the conclusion of the case study.
Spelling and grammar	( ) The case study is free of spelling and grammatical errors.	( ) The spelling and grammatical errors are limited – two total.	( ) The case study contains numerous spelling and grammatical errors – more than 2 total.
Overall Rating	( ) All target or acceptable		( ) The work in not acceptable
Comments:

Lesson Plan (20 points)

Case Study (30 points)

Lab Participation and Professionalism (8 labs x 15 points = 120 points total)

Total Points (out of 170)