Academic Affairs - Provost
Holloway Hall

STUDENT ACADEMIC GRIEVANCE POLICY

(BOR II-4.00)

See Also Faculty Handbook: Chapter 2

Salisbury University has established the Student Academic Grievance Policy to give students of the University community a forum in which to address concerns related to academic matters (e.g. grade disputes and professional program dismissals when they do not involve an academic integrity violation). The policy provides a method for aggrieved students to express substantive complaints about academic matters and have them resolved in a timely fashion. The following matters are not covered by these grievance procedures:  

     Claims involving alleged discrimination or harassment

     Claims relating only to alleged violations of policies which were promulgated exclusively by the University System of Maryland, actions of the Board of Regents or actions of the Chancellor of the System, over which SU has no jurisdiction

     Student judicial matters

     Grievances against University police officers that could result in the imposition of any discipline against the officer(s)

     Student Academic Integrity Violations

     Student Academic Misconduct Violations

Informal Grievance

Students are encouraged to attempt to resolve differences between themselves and others in an informal manner prior to initiating a formal grievance under this policy. This may entail only a conversation in which the views of both parties are aired in a mutually satisfactory manner or a conversation using a neutral third party for mediation. In the cases in which the differences involve a faculty member, and the differences are not resolved informally between the faculty member and the student, the student is encouraged to consult with the department Chair prior to filing a formal grievance.  If an informal resolution cannot be achieved, the grievant may elect to begin the formal grievance procedure that follows.

Formal Grievance

NOTE: Extenuating circumstances may cause the Office of Academic Affairs to extend the suggested time outlined below.

 Step One

The grievant must submit a formal grievance in writing to the person alleged to be responsible for the actions leading to the grievance before the mid-semester point of the following major semester as noted on the University’s master calendar). Nothing in this policy is to be construed to inhibit or prevent the grievant from withdrawing a formal grievance once the formal grievance procedures have begun.

A formal grievance must set forth in writing a statement which clearly defines the basis of the grievance, a chronology of events leading up to the grievance, the names of people with knowledge of the event, pertinent dates, a description of the actions taken against the grievant which led to the dissatisfaction and a proposed resolution to the situation. Any documentation relevant to the grievance should be attached to the letter. If known, information about relevant University academic policies should be provided. The grievant has the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the action or inaction complained about did occur and that it was inconsistent with University policies or procedures.

The person alleged to be responsible for actions leading to the grievance will provide a written response to the grievant within 10 working days of receiving the formal grievance.   The written decision should address the specific issues raised in the grievance and include all pertinent information.

Step Two

If the response is not satisfactory to the grievant; he or she has 10 working days to file the formal grievance with the supervisor of the person (department Chair for faculty member) alleged to be responsible for the actions leading to the grievance.  The grievant must include all prior written responses. The supervisor of the person alleged to be responsible for the actions leading to the grievance will provide a written response to the grievant and the person alleged to be responsible within 10 working days of receiving the formal grievance.

Step Three

If the supervisor’s response is not satisfactory, the grievant has 10 working days to file a formal grievance with the Dean of the school in which the dispute has occurred.  The grievant must include all prior written responses.  The Dean of the school will provide a written response to the grievant within 10 working days of receiving the grievance.

Step Four

If the response from the Dean of the school is not satisfactory, the grievant has 10 working days to forward the formal grievance to the Assistant Vice President of Academic Affairs who will refer the grievance to the Academic Policies Committee (APC) for review. In the event the Academic Policies Committee is not available, the Assistant Vice President of Academic Affairs will forward the appeal to the Provost, who will attempt to create an ad hoc committee to handle the review as soon as practicable. (All further references in this policy to the Academic Policies Committee include the ad hoc committee where appropriate.)

Committee Review of Evidence

The Committee normally has 15 working days from receiving the formal grievance to decide among the following options:

1)   Review Submitted Evidence: Render a written decision based on the documents and materials submitted with the appeal.

2)   Investigation: Render a written decision based on a series of interviews, a review of documents, and/or any other action deemed appropriate for the purpose of collecting additional information and evidence necessary for an informed and reasoned judgment to be rendered.  The investigation, including interviews, will usually be completed within 20 working days of  the decision to conduct an investigation. 

3)   Hearing: Render a written decision based on a hearing.  If the Committee determines that a hearing is to be held, the Committee shall send written notice of the time, date and location to all parties. The hearing shall be conducted as follows:         

     The hearing shall be held at a reasonable time when all parties (to the extent possible) are available or have an opportunity to be present. 

     The parties shall be entitled to make opening and closing statements. 

     The parties shall be entitled to present evidence through witnesses and documents, and shall be entitled to question witnesses.  At the discretion of the Chair of the Committee, direct questioning by a party of a witness, including an opposing party, may not be permitted; rather, the parties may be required to convey their questions to the Committee Chair, who will convey them to the witness. 

     Students are permitted to seek the support of a non-legal advocate for assistance in the preparation of a case before the Academic Policies Committee.  The advocate may counsel the grievant during the hearing but shall not officially speak or participate formally in the proceedings.  In all cases, the advocate must be a member of the University faculty, staff, or student body.   

     Neither party may be represented by an attorney at the hearing, unless they are facing or are likely to face criminal charges relating to the subject of the grievance. Under such circumstances the University legal counsel must also be present. At no time may legal counsel give statements or participate in questioning witnesses or Committee members.  

     The hearing shall be closed with attendance limited to individuals directly connected with the case as determined by the Chair of the Committee.  The University may record the hearing at the discretion of the Chair.  Any University recording will be University property for University reference only and will not be made part of the student’s University record. 

     Formal rules of evidence need not be followed at the hearing. The Committee may receive such evidence as a reasonable person would consider reliable in making important decisions. If a question arises about the authenticity of a document or the reasonableness, relevance or redundancy of evidence, the Chair of the Committee shall be the final decision maker on the evidence’s admissibility.  

     The parties may request, in writing, that the Committee contact specified persons to appear at the hearing to testify on behalf of the parties. The request must be made at least five working days before the scheduled hearing in order to allow ample time for the Committee to make the requests.  

     The Chair of the Committee shall be responsible for conducting the hearing in an efficient and decorous manner and shall rule on all disputes related to the procedures used throughout the proceedings. Reasonable limits may be set by the Chair on the length and nature of the opening statements, the evidence presented and on the duration of the hearing. At any time, the Chair may seek the advice of legal counsel.  

     Since the University lacks full judicial authority, such as the power to subpoena or place witnesses under oath, a party’s procedural rights cannot be coextensive with or identical to the rights afforded the accused in a civil or criminal legal proceeding. The procedures outlined are designed, however, to assure fundamental fairness and to protect parties from arbitrary or capricious disciplinary action. Deviations from these procedures shall not necessarily invalidate a hearing or the results of a hearing unless significant prejudice results. 

     When possible the hearing should be completed within 20 working days of the decision to conduct a hearing. 

Committee Findings

After the Committee has completed its review, the Committee shall issue a written decision based on findings of fact and conclusions, including procedures followed and any applicable University policies and procedures, usually within 10 working days, and shall provide a copy of the findings to all directly involved parties, including, but not limited to, the parties involved, the department Chair, the Dean of the school, the Office of Academic Affairs and the Assistant Vice President of Academic Affairs.  

Appeal of Committee’s Findings

If either party elects to appeal the decision of the Committee, he or she must provide written notice of the appeal to the Provost, within 10 working days from the date of the Committee’s written decision.  The written appeal should set forth all of the reasons that support reversal of the Committee’s decision and include any supporting documentation.

The Provost has the discretion to take any action necessary to thoroughly complete a review, and then will issue a decision, which will be binding and final.  The decision will be conveyed in writing to the student, the faculty member, department Chair, Dean of the school, the Office of Academic Affairs, the Assistant Vice President of Academic Affairs, and the Academic Policies Committee usually within 10 working days.

 

Revised Document Approved by the Faculty Senate on May 11, 1999

Second Revisions of Document Approved by Faculty Senate on March 13, 2001

Revisions Approved by Provost on October 7, 2002

Revisions Approved by Faculty Senate on March 29, 2005, and Provost on May 17, 2005

Revisions Approved by the Faculty Senate on May 5, 2009 and the Provost on May 15, 2009

Formatting revisions made on September 30, 2009
Revisions Approved by the Academic Policies Committee on January 15, 2013