Salisbury University Strategic Planning
Congress
June 6, 2003
Introductory Comments
The governing boards and presidents of most institutions have the legal
authority and the presidents the responsibility over all
university functions, including planning. University operations
and activities are delegated to qualified professionals, and in
most university settings, institutional strategic planning is a
shared, consultative process that assembles a diverse and
representative team for the purpose of planning for a
university’s future. Individuals pool their varied expertise and
interests to help formulate and finalize a plan that
concentrates a university’s efforts into achieving goals and
objectives defined by a university’s mission. Salisbury
University’s governing structure is consistent with that model
and our strategic planning effort in preparation for the
2003-2008 cycle has been and is consistent with that process.
In adopting a shared approach to strategic planning, the President recognizes
and embraces the varied opinions and expertise of our multitalented, versatile
University community and the value in uniting one another in common vision.
While she bears the primary responsibility for University planning and its
implementation, and the Provost, the Vice Presidents, and the Deans the
executive leadership over the same, it is the collective input from faculty,
students, staff, Board members, and other engaged parties that allow us to unite
our efforts in common goals and shared vision.
Our objectives for the June 6 Strategic Planning Congress are:
- to finalize a working draft of the
SU Strategic Plan 2003-2008 for presentation to the Long Range Academic Planning
Committee and the Provost; and,
- to identify and/or discuss primary
issues in which there are multiple courses of action, decision, and/or divergent
opinions
The temptation in many strategic planning events is to focus
discussion on a few primary issues and to resolve collegially as many as is
possible in a given period. Although this a valuable exercise, such discussions
must be secondary to the primary outcome, in this instance, finalizing a working
draft. In order for this to occur, the group must first establish consensus over
those planning objectives to which they readily concur are, or should be,
institutional priorities (at some stage or perhaps the whole period) during the
next five years. Once this is accomplished, time can be devoted to those issues
that require discussion that is more intensive.
Important notes about the current draft:
- The fifth iteration of the SU
Strategic Plan 2003-08 is the result of the work of the Strategic Planning Team
from August 2002 up to now
- The draft plan incorporates input from
months of environmental scanning, a SWOT analysis, results from the January 2003
planning workshop, collaborative input from multiple groups and/or individuals,
and lengthy SPT discussions regarding the core goals in relation to SU Mission.
You may access details
here.
- No priority has been assigned to any
objective of any goal; key objectives may not yet have been identified and/or
included in the draft plan
Helpful Guidelines for the June 6
Planning Congress
Please come prepared. You should review the draft document
PRIOR to the event.
Prior to June 6, identify whether you a) agree
with an
objective b) disagree with an objective c) agree with
qualifications. Your "agreement" or "disagreement" should be
based upon your knowledge of institutional issues, and whether or not the
objective should be prioritized as a primary outcome of the corresponding goal.
If you have issues with the way an objective is worded, you may decide to "agree
with qualifications." Additionally, please assess whether, in your informed
opinion, this objective is a low, medium, or high priority. Be mindful
that this is a five-year plan and that the plan will guide the allocation of
current and future resources, and that every objective cannot be accomplished at
the same rate. These activities will help us to avoid lengthy discussion over
items with which we all agree, allowing more time to identify objectives that
have not been included or require more intensive discussion.
Write down additional objectives or key issues
PRIOR to
the event. This will ensure that important discussion issues or items are not
forgotten.
Please do NOT deconstruct the GOALS. We will not
focus our discussion on the core goals.
Do not "word smith" in our large-group activities and avoid it in the
breakout sessions, if possible. "Wording" suggestions can be submitted in
writing to the SPT. We will not use our time debating individual phrasing unless
suggestions clarify the intent of an objective.
Be prepared to work in small breakout teams and to share in large groups.
Objectives will not be included or excluded by a majority vote. Our goal
is to reach consensus and to table key issues for discussion later in the day or
later in the year.
Please keep in mind that this is the Institutional strategic
plan. It is a plan for ALL of us. Although nearly every individual comes
as a representative of a group and your perspectives are essential to the
process, the University as an entity, students as central, and academic
excellence as the defining attribute are paramount to special interests.
Our mission statement affirms that we have several core purposes. The
strategic plan must address those purposes.
Not every worthwhile objective will be included in the plan; not every
suggestion will be adopted. Keep in mind that we need to develop a plan that is
forward-thinking and achievable.
Please note: Strategic planning is dynamic. The plan may need to change over
ensuing years in order to respond to external and internal initiatives.
Preliminary Agenda
Salisbury University Institutional Strategic Planning Congress
Scarborough Student Leadership Center, June 6, 2003
Please arrive by 8 am.
8 am – 8:15
- Introduction of Participants and Agenda
- Light Continental Breakfast Available
Today’s Outcome:
- A
working draft of the SU Strategic Plan 2003-2008
- Identification of any issues deferred for discussion
8:15 – 8:25
- Overview of process to date: PowerPoint
- Instructions to guide discussions
8:30 – 9:30
- Breakout sessions: Goal 1 (Academic Goal)
9:30 – 9:40
9:40 – 10:40
- Breakout sessions: Goal 2 (Student-Centered Goal)
10:40 – 10:50
10:50 – 12:00
- Large Group:
Discussion of Goals 1 & 2
- Identify similarities
- Focus: Identify differences of opinion and discuss
- Focus: Identify new initiatives not previously considered
12:10 – 12:50
1:00 – 1:50
- Breakout Sessions: Goal 3 (Diversity Goal)
1:50 – 2:30
- Breakout Sessions: Goal 4 (External Community)
2:30 – 2:45
2:45 – 3:45
- Large Group: Discussion of Goals 3 & 4
- Identify similarities
- Identify differences of opinion and discuss
- Identify new initiatives not previously considered
3:45 – 4:30
- Discussion of Tabled Issues/Conclusion
Note: There will be four breakout teams and sessions. Each team will
be facilitated by at least one Strategic Planning Team member.
Salisbury University Mission, Vision, and
Values
Mission
Salisbury University’s mission is to cultivate and sustain a superior,
student-centered learning community where students, faculty and staff are viewed
as both teachers and learners, and where a commitment to excellence permeates
all aspects of University life. We recruit exceptional and diverse faculty,
staff, undergraduate and graduate students and support them as they work
together to reach the University's goals. Serving Maryland and the Mid-Atlantic
region, we are concerned participants in responding to the educational,
economic, cultural and social needs of our community and believe that service is
a vital component of civic life. Our highest purpose is to empower our students
with the knowledge, skills and core values that contribute to life-long learning
and active citizenship in a democratic society and interdependent world. (1996)
Values
The core values of Salisbury University are excellence, student-centeredness,
learning, community, civic engagement, and diversity. We believe these values
must be lived and experienced as integral to everyday campus life so that
students make the connection between what they learn and how they live. (1996)
Vision
Salisbury University will continue as a premier regional university that is
recognized nationally for excellence by its peers and regionally for its
commitment to model programs in civic engagement. Undergraduate research,
service learning, international experiences, and co-curricular activities will
continue to enrich the traditional academic curriculum and enable students to
connect research to practice, theory to action. The University will provide
graduates who will be recruited by the best employers and graduate schools, and
who will contribute to the economic vitality of the State and the Nation. The
University will continue to enhance the quality of life for its students, the
State, and the region, and will explore opportunities to provide doctoral
programs in areas of need. (MFR, 2001)
Draft Preamble to the Strategic
Plan 05/23/03
Derived from the Salisbury University mission and reflecting institutional
values, the core goals and primary objectives of the Salisbury University
Strategic Plan 2003-08 guide the University’s priorities. The plan affirms
that students are central, with academic excellence the defining attribute.
Our primary purpose is education and, as a community of life-long learners,
we invest in the continuous development and support of our students, faculty,
and staff, and particularly those activities that advance successful living in
an increasingly global society. We uphold the diametric values of inclusiveness
and diversity. We recognize, respect, and embrace the innate similarities,
differences, and perspectives among groups and individuals. We are dedicated to
the intellectual, professional, cultural, personal, and social growth of our
students and University community. Moreover, in all of our endeavors, we hold
fiscal prudence as fundamental and intellectual confrontation, academic
excellence, and altruism as paramount.
Salisbury University Strategic Plan 2003-2008
Working Draft: 5th Iteration for the June 6 Planning
Congress
Goal 1:
The University will enhance an
academic and learning environment that promotes intellectual growth and success.
1. Maintain and advance academic excellence as the defining attribute of
all academic programs and student learning.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Action: Demonstrate
student learning through the continuous assessment of program-relevant student
learning outcomes.
- Action:
Support continuous program improvement through rigorous, ongoing academic
program review.
2. Support General Education as the necessary foundational experience
for students. (Student Learning Goals to be attached as an
appendix in final draft document)
(Note: this objective affirms the values and benefits of General Education
regardless of a student’s entering status)
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Involve each student in experiential learning, including but not
limited to: service learning; civic engagement; volunteering; internships;
student research; study abroad; and community outreach activities.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Provide resources that foster the library’s role as a learning center
and that position it at the top of its performance peers.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Action: Reinvent the
library as a collaborative, community enterprise
(Note: Where is the library in comparison to peers? Is establishing
an objective that "positions it at the top of its peers" too lofty a goal in a
five-year period given other priorities? BP)
5. Establish funding for endowed chairs and professorships in order to foster
academic distinction.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Assess the viability of current and potential undergraduate and
graduate programs and adjust support for these programs as appropriate.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Provide effective and reliable classroom and computer lab technology
and campus telecommunications infrastructure.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Promote student technology fluency in all academic disciplines, as well
as faculty and staff development in the use of technology in teaching and
services.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Develop and implement equitable and reasonable faculty workload
standards.
Alternate: Develop and implement equitable faculty workload
standards that are comparable to University peers.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Develop and implement mechanisms for enhancing faculty rewards and
support.
Alternate: Develop and implement mechanisms for enhancing faculty
rewards and support that reflect the goals of the University.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Strengthen available resources for scholarship, research, sabbatical
leaves, professional activities, and other faculty development opportunities.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Enhance private fundraising for capital initiatives and other
priorities identified in the Facilities Master Plan.
Alternate: Enhance private and public fundraising for capital
initiatives and other priorities identified in the Facilities Master Plan
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Maintain or improve faculty and staff ratios, salaries, and benefits
to levels that are comparable to our peers.
Alternate: The University will maintain its commitment to having the
vast majority of its instructional staff consist of tenured and tenure-track
faculty, and will strive to provide healthcare, pension, and other benefits to
all faculty members.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal 2: The University will advance a student-centered
environment.
1. Increase the level of funding for need- and merit-based undergraduate
and graduate scholarships.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Create a "Student Learning and Enrichment Center" to assist the
academic achievement of students of all abilities.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Maintain and improve the high quality of advising, individualized for
undergraduates and graduates.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Action: Establish
faculty/advisee ratios at levels consistent with BOR policies and school
guidelines
- Action:
Ensure that a full-time advising coordinator is on staff in all schools
4. Encourage the acquisition of "soft-skills" (i.e. non-competency-based
general education skills and attributes) by supporting student portfolio
development.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Action: Encourage
more faculty involvement via advising and the selection of evidence or artifacts
for student portfolios
5. Improve student access to healthcare and wellness services, programs, and
facilities.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Facilitate student access to administrative campus services through the
development of a campus web portal or other IT mechanisms.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Examine and implement, where feasible, alternative scheduling options
and support services to meet the needs of our students.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Sustain the national caliber Division III Athletics Program while
affirming academics as the highest priority in the life of student-athletes.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Provide classrooms and a classroom setting that fosters effective
faculty-student connections and engaged, interactive student learning, and
optimizes student to faculty ratios.
Alternate: Ensure that class sizes are reasonable in order to provide
effective faculty-student connections and engaged, interactive student learning
in the classroom.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Develop and implement a more comprehensive orientation program for
transfer students with the goal of deepening their connection with their peers
and the University and to aid their transition and performance.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal 3:
The University will foster inclusiveness as well as cultural
and intellectual pluralism.
1. Provide multicultural and sensitivity training for the campus community
and encourage the integration of all students into governance, social, and
academic support programs.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Recognize, develop, and implement criteria that affirm multiple
admission factors including: grade point average, academic recommendation,
enhancement of campus diversity, civic engagement, extracurricular activities,
leadership opportunities, written essays, standardized test scores, interviews,
faculty contacts, and other factors deemed essential by the academic community.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Foster the growth of a student and employee population that is more
reflective of regional diversity and SU’s Values.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Enhance and/or create more extensive support programs to increase the
retention and graduation rates of minority and international students to levels
that surpass our peers.
Alternate: Enhance and/or create more extensive support programs to increase
the retention and graduation rates of minority and international students to
levels that are comparable to the entire student body.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Increase visibility and accountability of specialist staff and programs
campus-wide.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Expand academic and social practices/support for the integration of
international students into SU and the local community.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Establish SU linkages to existing immigrant services, specifically
assessing needs of immigrant populations.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Reorganize existing funding with an emphasis on competitive salaries to
target potential diverse faculty to special/endowed positions.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Promote international educational opportunities as a means of
broadening life experience and cross-cultural understanding for students and
faculty.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal 4:
The University will utilize strategic collaborations and
targeted community outreach to benefit Maryland and the region.
1. Audit all SU strategic collaborations and targeted
community outreach activities for the purpose of organizing these activities in
line with institutional priorities.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Perform a "Regional Needs versus Institutional
Capabilities Gap Analysis, including regional business, economic, community, and
workforce development needs in all subject areas
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Develop and implement a comprehensive University marketing
plan that targets all internal and external audience segments.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Encourage and support the development of grant and
sponsored research projects and programs that support the University’s mission.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Encourage and support the development of continuing
education programs as revenue sources.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Establish the roles of students, faculty, and staff
involved in (SU) strategic collaborations and targeted community outreach
activities, and recognize and reward their contributions in line with our
institutional mission and BOR priorities.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Establish or enhance collaborations with schools,
community, government, and non-government organizations.
|
Agree |
Disagree |
Agree w/ Qualifications |
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Action:
Respond to State "Teacher Education" initiatives by partnering with multiple
communities while pursuing enhanced public/private support of those initiatives.
- Action: Respond to State "Nursing" workforce initiatives by partnering with
medical professionals and local communities while pursuing enhanced
public/private support of those initiatives.
- Action:
Respond to State "Information Technology" workforce initiatives by partnering
with regional industries and businesses while pursuing enhanced public/private
support of those initiatives.
Glossary
Goals: core purposes or outcomes to which the University
directs its endeavors in order to accomplish its mission. Goals directly
reflect the primary purposes identified in the University’s mission and vision
statements.
Objectives: quantifiable and measurable initiatives to
which the University directs its priorities in order to accomplish its goals.
Primary objectives are direct outcomes of University goals and
should be both measurable and time-constrained.
Actions: specific steps or strategies that are necessary
to accomplish objectives. Actions are vital to the annual planning
process and implementation phases of a strategic plan.
Accountability: responsibility. A necessary process that
identifies the individual(s) or group(s) most responsible for specific
objectives. Accountability is usually assigned to the highest possible levels,
i.e., divisional leaders and/or key groups, and is necessary to ensure that the
plan guides institutional priorities and the resource and allocation process.
|