Funding Peers
Armstrong Atlantic State University Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania California University of Pennsylvania Central Washington University Citadel Military College of South Carolina Clarion University of Pennsylvania East Central University East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania Eastern Illinois University Edinboro University of Pennsylvania Emporia State University Florida Gulf Coast University Georgia College & State University Indiana University- South Bend Indiana University-Southeast James Madison University Kutztown University of Pennsylvania
|
McNeese State University Millersville University of Pennsylvania Northwestern State University of Louisiana Pittsburg State University Plymouth State University Radford University Rowan University Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania Sonoma State University Southeast Missouri State University Southern Oregon University SUNY at Fredonia SUNY College at Brockport SUNY College at Cortland SUNY College at New Paltz SUNY College at Oswego
|
SUNY College at Plattsburgh The College of New Jersey The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga The University of Texas at Tyler University of Central Arkansas University of Illinois at Springfield University of Massachusetts - Dartmouth University of North Alabama University of North Carolina - Wilmington University
of Northern Iowa University of Wisconsin - La Crosse University of Wisconsin - Oshkosh Valdosta State University West Texas A & M University Western Connecticut State University Western Illinois University Western Oregon University Winthrop University
|
How were the Funding Peers developed?
For funding and institutional performance comparisons, Salisbury
University is considered a peer to those universities closest to
it on a number of variables identified by the
Maryland
Higher Education Commission. The Commission defined five variations,
each with different variables, in which SU is compared against institutions
in the same Carnegie class. Each variable in each variation is calculated
for a variable “proximity-score” and when totaled, the 20 closest
institutions to SU are considered funding peers in that single variation.
Since there are five variations, it would be possible to have 100
institutions in the peer funding group. However, because there is
typically a considerable amount of institutional overlap across
variations, 52 funding peers were
generated for SU after the 2007 recalculation. From those "52 funding
peers" Salisbury University is required to select 10 performance
peers. These performance peers are used for state-level comparisons.
|
