|
FISCAL ADVISORY
Fiscal
Advisory Committee Notes
October 13,
2007, PCR, 3-4:15 pm
Notes taken
by: Jackie Eberts
Members
Present: Jackie Eberts, Lisa Gray, Becky Emory, Memo Diricker, Tim Dunn,
Robert Long, Kashi Khazeh, Kevin Dellaire, Jigna Rana, Jo Laird & Greig
Mitchell
Others
Present: Tom Jones, Betty Crockett & Alan Selser
The topic of how the
Supplemental Funds Request should be handled for FY’07 verses FY’06
was discussed at length along with the previous year’s document
‘Financial & Budget Communications Outline’, a mention of the memo
sent out last year, to the VP’s, from the FAC chair regarding
‘Supplemental Funds Request for Spring’06 as well as the general,
overall timeline/structure of the ‘06 supplemental funding format and
how it should be handled for ’07 (if funds were to be available).
Note: current, new FAC members were not given a copy of the previous
year’s format but there is information which can be reviewed on the
FAC website.
Questions arising were 1)
did the process work last year? 2) how had the process improved last
year compared to other years? And 3) should there be earlier deadlines
for the fall’06 for process improvement to occur (e.g. this would give
departments time to discuss their ‘what if’ deadlines before
determining their ‘final’ list for submission)?
The Provost felt there had
been some confusion with the new process last year but hopes to work
it out this year with both the VP’s & Dean’s as well as having them
encourage each of their staff to actively participate with their
VP/Dean by the designated deadlines. Sidebar: Both Tom and Greig
felt that sometimes the FAC must go with certain assumptions regarding
input for Supplemental Funding when all are working under various time
constraints, etc..
Greig recalled recommending
last year that departments maintain a list of funded and unfunded
items and any unfunded items from last year might be at the top of the
priority list for this year.
As it stands currently,
preliminary supplemental funding lists are due back to the FAC for
review in January. Should this date be moved up.
It was also discussed that
the operation budget timeline also needs refined as well as creating a
‘simplified’ budget for the FAC’s use along with more meaningful
descriptions of the items requested. In refining the OB, the
supplemental funding budgets could have much more detail than
previously reviewed by FAC. Apparently, most felt the OB had too
little detail while the SB had too much detail.
Johanna agreed to create a
template form that will be submitted to each Department to record
their ‘wish list’ items (hopefully with some type of priority) should
funding become available. Having and using a template format will
hopefully contribute to maintaining a clear, consistent, simplified,
easy to read/review departmental request for anyone involved in this
funding process. A benefit from using this format is that it should
also develop an assumed culture with the expectation for future
supplemental funds.
Meeting adjourned 4:15 pm.
Back
to Top
|